data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baea6/baea6fc85485c8dc43e6cb0e6eb550848cbee13a" alt=""
I started to look back in history a little – what about the Ancient Greek and Roman empires? The Olympic marathon itself is a tribute to the system of message runners. Indeed, the first evidence of such messengers is from Ancient Greece around 500 BC, and continued into the Roman empire. As the legend goes, Pheidippides, a Greek runner, ran all day and night from Marathon to Athens (the terrain was too tough on horses) to deliver the message of victory against the Persians, dropping dead of exhaustion as soon as his message was delivered. “No finer way to die” it was declared. Running messages was a highly prestigious, respected position. No easy job but invaluable. Information was King, literally. And the Persians? Even as they clashed with the Greeks they were at their peak and had expanded their empire widely. As early as 500 BC Cyrus the Great, and then Darius, extended the road network and set up the first postal system, posting stations where new men and fresh horses would be available at any moment to carry a message further on. Information traveled at the fastest documented speeds of the time – up to 200 miles (320 km) a day.
My husband has been reading over my shoulder. You can’t leave out the Pony Express he says. Of course not, I say (Umm, what’s that exactly?). It was a fast mail service across the United States in the 1800s, a commercial undertaking of massive proportion. 157 stations placed at intervals of about 10 miles - the maximum distance a horse could gallop, allowed the rider to change to a new horse at each station, crashing the time it took to get across the United States to ten days. Riders were apparently paid $25 per week compared to the $1 per week you got for unskilled work. Clearly they understood the value in speed of information.
I have not come across any historical evidence of official, full-time messengers in India. Besides, here in South India and many other parts, people were certainly never known for their horsemanship. And today, finding out what’s up in the next town is clearly not an organized priority. Now of course there is TV, but TV does not cover news of very local importance such as a lost cow, a job in the next village or your next village neighbors new cool idea.
That said, it is unlikely that horseback messengers and town criers did not exist in the kingdoms that were once India. Still, from what I gather it was probably not as prestigious, organized and granted as high a stature. And it might still be useful, particularly in the village context where literacy is low. Indeed it seems as though in the last fifty years, some communities here have picked up on it. Only thing, it’s not granted nearly its due importance and value.
This piece is interesting. I am not sure how true it was. Birds were also used as messengers, as can be inferred from the ancient Tamil literature.
ReplyDeleteContrasting what we were in the 19th century to what we are today, I think the human race has found innovative solutions to many of its painful problems. One can only think of possibilities. Nothing can literally stop us from innovating.
While I agree that opportunities are limited and people in rural areas are compelled to restrict their circle of influence to a narrow limit, should we treat the poor (be it urban or rural) with a patronizing approach?
ReplyDeleteSecondly the number of students from villages who make it to the larger world is ever increasing and isnt this indication that the poor do find a way if we give them the means?
Tara - I am not sure if you remember me, I used to work for ARCON in Chennai that your father and Prof Ramachander started in 1987. My name is Chitra. I am keen on getting back to academics and my area of interest is Neuropsychology. If you find time please do write to me at chitrasharan@hotmail.com.
ReplyDeleteAs convincing as it was, may be we are looking at it from the wrong side. May be the real problem is unorganized markets. Educating/Inspiring a thousand villages to go beyond their comfort zone could be difficult. I guess facilitating a single aggregator to cross the borders (This might sound capitalistic) is still the best way.
ReplyDeleteWhat about the psychological make up of the rural folks. How do we empower them to embrace change and give them the strength to move out of their comfort zones?
ReplyDeleteSreelaj, unorganized markets is a huge problem. However, after several years of observation my view is that it is unorganized because people have very little organized information about markets. In that sense, I don't think this post looks at the wrong side but the other side of the same coin. Information about local markets will catalyze organized markets.
ReplyDeleteAnd as for the comment about it being patronizing, I tend to disagree - I am suggesting that the poor will step up if they simply have organized access to information. Without the internet, search, and news media the rest of us would be lost and circumscribed in our abilities as well.